:: <  BURNSURGERY.ORG :: >

Educating the burn care professionals around the world

Search Site  

HOME

Navigation

 

 

 

 

THE   BURN   NUTRITION   MODULE

Robert H. Demling, M.D. Leslie DeSanti R.N.Dennis P. Orgill, M.D. PhD.

Section  VI

 

How to provide optimal nutrition? (Role of Nutritional Supplements)

FOOD

  • Providing optimum nutrition early including: 

    • adequate ENERGY and nutrient profile

    • adequate PROTEIN

  • Use of anabolic agents if needed to increase the rate of anabolic activity

  • Providing excercise stimulus to muscles 

NUTRITION:  Basic Principles

Optimum nutrition is essential to keep up with the increase calorie demands and to decrease the rate of catabolism or use of body protein for fuel.  The objective is first provide the calorie and protein demands,  The second objective is to provide the appropriate nutrient mix.

Nutrient Mix:  Carbohydrate (CHO) calories are provided at about 60% of total calories.  Excess CHO however is deleterious leading to hyperglycemia and fat formation.  Fat calories (20-25% of total), are provided to reach the energy demands.  Endogenous fat stores are also used. Fat will not spare protein loss.  Excess fat, is also deleterious, being a substrate for immunosuppressive mediators.

Protein:  Protein requirements are 2-3 times the recommended daily allowance (RDA = 0.8g/kg/day), being 1.5-2 grams/kg body weight per day.  THe increased protein intake will decrease the net N losses by increasing the amino acid flow into the protein synthesis channel.  Glutamine is the most prominent amino acid lost in muscle and should be provided in increased amounts preferably orally (10-30 grams/day).

Micronutrients must be given in increased quantities (5-10 times the RDA) to keep up with the increase metabolism and quickly restore deficiencies.

Timing:  It is essential to initiate nutrient support as soon as possible after the catabolic insult.  Nutrition should begin within 48 hours of the catabolic insult, especially in the presence of mild to moderate malnutrition.

 

Choices for Route of Nutrient Delivery

Route:

Enteral (First Choice)

 

Parenteral (Second Choice)

Advantage:
  • Improves nutrient utilization, especially protein
  • Protects gut mucosa
Advantage
  • Can initiate nutrition if gut not functional
  • Does not require patient cooperation
Disadvantage:
  • Aspiration
  • Impaired absorption
  • Requires patient cooperation
Disadvantage:
  • High infection risk (line sepsis)
  • Other catheter complications

 

Timing:
  • As soon as possible to avoid gyt function problems
Timing:
  • Postresuscutation (usually day 3)
  • If needed to supplement enteral route
Approach:
  • Eating plus nutrient supplements
  • Tube feeding

    -- Best postpyloric feeding tube alternate is gastric tube

Approach:
  • Central line through nonburn area
  • Peripheral line for more dilute solutions

 

 

Route (Enteral):  The most beneficial rout is the enteral route.  A severe burn also produces gut if prior malnutrition has resulted in dysfunction with intestinal mucosal atrophy and if enteral nutrition is not begun, early hydrolysate with increased peptides until mucosal function improves.  Initial nutrition: a combination of enteral and parenteral routes may be needed early in the course.

FOOD

  • Essential to guide and monitor patients nutrient choices at all phases of injury (especially protein)
  • Food intake alone is not adequate to meet goals in a major burn

    *nutrient supplements are essential

Having defined the nutrition goals, the next issue is how to provide the nutrients to meet those goals. Parenteral nutrition is risky but the nutrient mix can be made to order and delivery does not require patient participation.

Enteral nutrition is the optimum approach but patient participation is required which can be a major problem in the presence of pain, agitation and sedation.

Food intake must be guided and monitored so as to meet goals especially protein. Injured patients usually do not select high protein foods and food intake will not reach nutrition goals of a major burn. Nutrient supplements must be selected carefully in order to meet nutrient goals but decrease complications.

Commercially available supplements in general have a high simple sugar content (increasing risks of hyperglycemia) a high fat content and a protein content which is usually to low for a major burn requiring adding protein. Osmolarity must be considered to decrease hyperosmolarity induced problems.

Finally, palatability is a big problem. Selecting the supplement which the patient will actually drink is of importance.

Examples of Nutrient Supplementation

Young patient with massive burn and respiratory distress receiving nutrition via feeding tube. Formulation is high protein including high content of peptides for better gut absorption.  Moderate calorie density 1 ca/cc along with some fiber, as quantity of fluid is not a limiting factor.  Total daily volume is 2.5 liters of supplement.

Elderly patient with moderate burn but with pre-existing involuntary weight loss and heart disease.  Supplementation of regular meals is required to meet both calorie and demands.  A high calorie density supplement (2 cal/cc) taken orally, limits fluid intake.

NUTRIENT SUPPLEMENTS

Numerous studies demonstrate the benefits of nutrient supplements especially protein for restoring energy and protein requirements in the burn patient and maintaining these requirements during the stress phase.

The increase demands, especially if restoration of depleted body lean mass is required usually exceed that which a comprised patient can achieve with intake of food.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Nutrient Supplements

  • Need for high calorie - high protein, high protein - moderate calorie
  • Quality of the contained nutrients and macronutrients
  • Nutrient mix
  • Route of administration
  • Complications

Many high protein supplements are non-palatable for oral consumption and are really used only for tube feeding.  Some newer formulations are much more palatable and can be added between meals.  In addition, all proteins are not equal.  Some proteins and their peptide content have a higher biologic value, i.e. increased nitrogen retention, based on the their structure and composition.  In addition, specific peptides can act like growth factors or added anabolic stimuli.


 

 


© Copyright 2000 Burnsurgery.org. All Rights Reserved