|
|
MOIST
HEALING AND WOUND CARE INCLUDING BURNS
|
|
(Advantages
and Current Approaches)
|
| |
Section
I. HISTORICAL OVERVIEW
Prior
to the late 20th century, wounds were felt to heal
better if exposed under a "scab". This process
produced surface desiccation and eschar formation now known to
deepen the wound, but was felt to protect the wound. The
thinking may have been correct given the fact that no
antibacterial agents were available to treat an infection.
The
most detailed descriptions were found in medical books from
Ancient Greece. Although the initial ingredients first applied
to the burn and other wounds varied considerably, wound
dryness was always sought.
The
description of the healing process leading to scar as the
normal endpoint would indicate that outcomes were less than
ideal.
This
concept remained popular for wound care until the mid-20th
century (and even longer for the burn wound). One exception
was a report in the early 19th century where burns
and wounds were managed with the wound immersed under water,
with good healing results. This concept was not accepted
however as a standard of care.
Allen
and Koch in 1942 popularized a petrolatum gauze and dressing
closure method which decreased the surface drying. The primary
death from burns was at that time and remained so, septicemia
from burn infection and therefore there were many who returned
to exposure, especially with the advent of a topical
antibiotic cream by Fox 1969 (silver sulfadiazine) and
Moncrief 1971 (sulfamylon). The introduction of silver nitrate
soaks by Moyer in 1965 required an occlusive dressing and was
the first use of a moist wound healing method in burns. However,
the main concept in burn care was not wet or dry, but rather
control of infection by topical antibiotics.
These
topical antibiotics can control infection but do also retard
healing, especially re-epithelialization.
The
following graphic describes the interesting conceptual
diversion of non-burn wound, burn wound care in the 1960s
as to optimum management. This difference in management
persists today. Although the availability of a sulfamylon
solution may alter this difference.
Superficial Burns an exception
Example
of exposure approach with dry eschar 
Click
the Image to Enlarge
 
|