|
|
 |
-
CLINICAL COMPARISON OF ACTICOAT™
&
OTHER SILVER COMPOUNDS IN BURNS
- Antimicrobial Effects and Infection
Control
A number of clinical trials have been performed
comparing antibacterial efficacy of the
nanocrystal silver delivery system.
Tredget et.al performed a randomized prospective
trial in burns comparing nanocrystal silver
delivery versus silver nitrate 0.5%. The
nanocrystal silver significantly decreased wound
colonization. In addition, there was a
significant decrease in burn wound infection (>
105 organisms per gram tissue) and
bacteremias.
Stephens et al compared nanocrystal silver
delivery and silver sulphadiazine on deep burns
in 20 patients. There was no evidence of
infections in either group but nanocrystalline
silver (Acticoat) was reported to produce less
pain, and nursing time due to less frequent
dressing changes, i.e. twice a day versus every
three days.
In a study reported by Honori et.al., randomized
prospective trial, nanocrystal delivery use
resulted in a 0% infection rate compared to 5.2%
with the use of silver sulfadiazine on donor
sites in burn patients. Another study on
superficial partial thickness burns reported a
50% decrease in local infections with the use of
nanocrystal silver versus xeroform gauze, a
common treatment for superficial burns. A study
in toxic epidermal necrolysis patients reported
nanocrystal silver to be as effective as silver
nitrate in controlling infection. There was
much less pain and less nursing time required
with the silver membrane.(34)
In summary to date, clinical studies on burns
have demonstrated that use of the nanocrystal
silver delivery system is either better or at
least as effective an antimicrobial as the
currently used silver compounds. However, every
study demonstrated less patient pain and
considerably less nursing time with use of the
silver membrane.
|
- Improved Healing
Several clinical trials have identified that
nanocrystal silver delivery improves healing of
partial thickness wounds. These wounds include
donor sites, partial thickness skin slough
disorders and re-epithelialization of meshed
skin grafts.
|
|
Efficacy Studies on Nanocrystal Silver Use
(Increased Re-epithelialization Rate) |
Donor
Sites Acticoat
vs. Xeroform
- Increased healing with nanocrystal silver Acticoat
vs. SSD+
-
Improved healing with nanocrystal silver
|
Skin Slough Acticoat vs. Silver
Nitrate (TENS)
- Improved healing
|
Meshed Grafts Acticoat
vs. Neosporin Solution
-30% reduction with Acticoat in time to
re-epithelialization |
+ silver
sulfadiazine
* nanocrystal silver
|
|
The donor site studies comparing nanocrystal
silver versus xeroform also compared, a moist
healing used with the silver dressing with a dry
environment seen with xeroform making it
difficult to determine what component of the
silver or the moisture was responsible. The
study, by Demling, et.al., on mesh graft
re-epithelialization compared the silver moist
healing environment with that of a standard
diluted Neosporin solution. In this study, the
only difference in the wound environment was the
presence of the nanocrystalline release of
silver. The study was performed on the rate of
re-epithelialization across a standard meshed
graft on an excised wound, both approaches being
used on the same patient. The significant
increase in healing with pure silver more
clearly reflects silver healing properties. The
mechanisms are yet to be defined. |
-
Versatility
Because of the potent antimicrobial
pro-healing properties and ease of use, the
nanocrystal silver delivery system has been
effectively used on a variety of burns with
success.
Currently ActicoatTM has been reported to be
effective and efficient in managing the wounds
described below.
|
Uses of nanocrystalline silver delivery in burns:
-
Deep dermal
to full thickness: prior to and after
excision
-
Partial
thickness burns
- usually large
with a potential for infection
|
|
The ability to use one effective silver product
from admission of a deep burn to coverage of
meshed grafts and donor sites has many clinical
uses and cost effective advantages.
The data on antimicrobial efficacy in deep burns
has been described. The data on donor
sites indicates decreased infections as well as
decreased pain with Acticoat, especially
compared to xeroform gauze. The data on
use over meshed skin grafts indicates a
prohealing as well as antimicrobial effect.
One wound which deserves special attention is
the partial thickness skin slough wound as seen,
e.g. in Toxic Epidermal Necrolysis (TENS).
Typically, the wounds are partial thickness but
very large in size and extremely painful.
In addition, these wounds are often present in
immuno-compromised patients and therefore require
antimicrobial coverage.
The major problems in these patients are control
of severe pain, infection and healing. The
standard use of antimicrobials with frequent
dressing changes typically leads to not only
severe pain and high narcotic needs but wound
manipulation induced endotoxemia, bacteremia,
increased inflammation and immense nursing
resources.
Less pain, fewer wound related side effects, and
negative effects of narcotics have been well
documented with nanocrystal silver use.
Increased rate of re-epithelialization has also
been reported likely due to the ability to
maintain an undisturbed optimum healing
environment. |
|
Use of ActicoatTM to cover meshed
skin graft |
|
 |
|
Acticoat in place day 3 |
|
 |
|
Note excellent conformability |
|
 |
 |
|
TENS Patient |
Wound Coverage with ActicoatÔ |
|
 |
ActicoatTM
changed every 3-5 days.
|
- Patient Comfort and Decreased
Toxicity
The major cause of pain in the burn patient is
the dressing change. This problem is of less
concern with deep burns. However, wound
manipulation does lead to increased bacteremias,
cytokine release and an inevitable pyrogen
response in the post-dressing change period.
The increased body temperature also corresponds
with lethargy, hemo-dynamic instability and
increased oxygen demands. Increased CO2
production also occurs.
A number of studies have demonstrated less pain
with dressing changes compared to the use of
other products. Honari et.al., compared the
pain of a donor site treated with nanocrystal
silver dressing versus SSD and noted a
significant decrease in pain using the silver
dressing. Stephens et.al., reported a
significant decrease in pain in deep burns using
the silver delivery system compared to silver
sulfadiazine SSD. Tredget et al,
reported a similar decrease in pain with
dressing changes in burn wounds with nanocrystal
silver delivery versus silver nitrate
solution. A decrease in pain has been reported
in TENS patients using the silver delivery
membrane compared to silver nitrate solution.
It is quite evident that wetting the outer
surface of the silver dressing is much less
painful than removal and replacement of SSD or
use of silver nitrate in burns or xeroform in
donor sites.
Decreasing the toxicity of wound manipulation is
another significant benefit of the
nanocrystalline silver delivery system, where
wound manipulation is minimal. Demling et.al.,
recently reported a study comparing the burn
care response of nanocrystalline silver versus
SSD in deep burns. A randomized prospective
study was undertaking looking at pain, cost
effectiveness and wound care side effects of
silver delivery compared to SSD.
|
|
Clinical
Response to Dressing Changes+ |
| |
Burn Size |
Dressing Changes |
Increased Temp.
(>101 F°) |
Hemodynamic Changes |
| |
|
|
|
BP
|
Pulse |
|
SSD
(n=25) |
25±8% |
42±10 |
100% |
20% |
100% |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Silver Delivery |
28±9% |
36±9 |
10%* |
5%* |
40%* |
|
*significantly
different from silver delivery
+
time period from
onset to 3 hrs post dressing
A significant
decrease in wound care related complications
were noted using the nanocrystalline silver. |
- Cost Effectiveness
Several clinical studies on burns and skin
sloughs have demonstrated a significant decrease
in cost using the nanocrystal silver delivery
system. Demling, et.al.(67) recently
reported a significant decrease in actual cost
(not charges) for deep burn wound care due
mainly to the marked decrease in nursing care
and pain medication required.
|
|
 |
|
Other studies have reported a similar cost
effectiveness due mainly to at least a 60%
decrease in nursing time for wound care. The
decrease in wound manipulation also markedly
decreases pain, pain medications and narcotic
induced morbidity. The studies include the
management of skin slough disorders, deep burns.
All studies demonstrated cost effectiveness with
a cost saving of 15-25% compared to standard of
care. |
|
CASE 1:
Patient is a 40year old male injured in a plane
crash. He suffered deep burns to 60% of TBS
plus a fractured pelvis. He weighed 350 pounds
and any turning was very difficult for him and
the staff. After initial resuscitation, all
burns were covered with ACTICOATÔ
until excision and grafting could be performed.
Initial assessment of back and buttock burns was
that of a deep dermal burn which may require
grafting. Back and buttock care was markedly
simplified by the use of ACTICOATÔ
and buried catheters to rewet. The wound
beneath the ACTICOATÔ
was clean and moist with minimal exudates. Of
interest was the fact that the back did not
require excision but healed in 21 days.
Bacterial count was always scant growth.
|
|
Burn
Admission
|
Burn Day 3 |
|
 |
 |
|
Note:
burn is deep dermal to full thickness. |
Note:
adherence presence of moisture layer and lack of
exudates. |
| |
|
Burn Day 21 |
|
 |
Burn completely
re-epithelialized
with return of pigment
|
|
CASE 2:
Patient is a 40-year old male
injured in a plane crash. He suffered deep
burns to 60% of TBS plus a fractured pelvis. He
weighed 350 pounds and any turning was very
difficult for him and the staff. After initial
resuscitation, all burns were covered with
ACTICOATTM until excision and grafting could be
performed. |
|
Admission burn
|
 |
|
Burns at day 10 |
 |
|
Note: nice adherence of the
ActicoatTM to the burn wound. |
|
Burn at 14 days |
 |
|
Note:
re-epithelialization |
|
Summary |
|
Nanocrystalline silver delivery
by ActicoatTM is
beneficial for the management of:
|
|
The mechanism is
likely multifactorial:
-
Eliminating toxic complexes
-
Decreasing bacteria and
inflammation
-
Moist wound healing
-
Decreased mechanical trauma
-
Direct healing effect of
nanocrystal silver
|
TOC
[Use
of
ActicoatTM]
|
|
|
| |