Chapter 6: IV Fluids
I.V.
FLUIDS AT______________________
TITRATE___________________________
I. Pathophysiology
A.
Four major
processes are thought to contribute to the major loss of
intravascular fluid[i]:
1.
change in microvascular membrane integrity
2.
change in Starling tissue forces
3.
cellular shock
4.
evaporative losses
B. Changes in microvascular
integrity
1. Following
a burn there is a massive release of inflammatory
mediators.
2. Histamine
is released early,[ii]
followed by complement, arachidonic acid, coagulation
cascades, and cytokines, particularly IL-1 and TNF, which
increase capillary permeability.
3.
Polymorphonuclear leukocytes adhere to the
endothelium, releasing oxygen free radicals.
This leads to lipid peroxidation with lysis of the
endothelial cell membrane and further arachidonic acid
metabolism, which potentiates the above.
C. Changes in tissue
Starling forces
1. The
capillary leak causes fluid and plasma proteins to shift from
the intravascular to the interstitial space.
2.
This causes hypoproteinemia, decreased intravascular
oncotic pressure and increased interstitial oncotic pressure.
Edema results when the volume of interstitial fluid
exceeds the capacity of the
lymphatics to remove it.
In burns greater than 35% TBSA, this edema is seen even
in nonburned tissue. Controversy
exists as to when capillary integrity is restored.
Currently, this is thought to be between 8 and 12
hours.
D. Cellular shock
In burns of
>30% TBSA, there is a decrease in the sodium ATPase which
causes a decrease in cell transmembrane potential.[iii]
This results in an increase in intracellular sodium,
cellular edema, and cell death.
E.
Evaporative losses
Additional evaporative losses
through the burn wound can be between 4 and 20 times greater
than normal and persist until complete wound closure is
obtained.
II.
Fluid Resuscitation
A. The principles of fluid
resuscitation
1. Give
the least amount of fluid necessary to maintain adequate organ
perfusion. This
volume should be continuously titrated to urine output to
avoid over- or under- resuscitation.[iv],[v]
2.
Intravenous fluid resuscitation is required for all
patients with 2nd and 3rd degree burns
greater than 10% TBSA in patients under 10 or over 50 years of
age. Fluid resuscitation is also required for burns greater than
20% TBSA in all other age groups.
B. Fluids
1. Lactated
Ringer’s (LR) solution is the most popular resuscitation
fluid used. Table
I compares the composition of LR with normal saline and
plasma.
Table
I: Crystalloid
Solutions[vi]
|
|
Plasma
|
0.9%
Saline
|
Ringer’s
lactate
|
|
|
Na
|
141
|
154
|
130
|
mEq/L
|
|
Cl
|
103
|
154
|
109
|
mEq/L
|
|
K
|
4-5
|
--
|
4
|
mEq/L
|
|
Ca/Mg
|
5/2
|
--
|
3/0
|
mEq/L
|
|
Buffer
|
Bicarb. (26)
|
--
|
Lactate (28)
|
mEq/L
|
|
pH
|
7.4
|
5.7
|
6.7
|
|
|
Osmolality (mosm/kg)
|
289
|
308
|
273
|
|
2.
There are numerous formulae that can be used for
fluid
resuscitation.
No fluid
resuscitation formula has proven to be superior.
All formulae are only a starting point.
3.
Fluid prescription for adults in the United States
commonly uses the Parkland Formula which is:
|
4cc
X weight (kg) X %TBSA burn = cc’s for 1st
24 hours (Lactated Ringer's)
|
One half of this total is administered over the first 8
hours,
and the second half over the next 16 hours.
4.
Fluid resuscitation requirements differ in children
due to their increased surface area-to-weight ratio.
The formula we use for resuscitation
in pediatric patients is the modified Carvajal formula[vii],[viii]:
|
5000cc X BSA (m2) [burn-related
losses]
cc’s for 1st 24 hours (D5 LR for
children up
PLUS
= to 1 year, Lactated Ringer's for children
2000cc X BSA (m2)
[maintenance fluids]
up to 10 yrs of age)
BSA=
Body Surface Area, which is obtained from a standard
height-weight
nomogram
|
One half of
this total is administered over the first 8 hours, and second
half over the next 16 hours.
[Note:
The eWheel which can be downloaded from the Journal of
Burns website (www.journalofburns.com)
provides an easy and quick method of calculating fluid
requirements using the above formulae]
5.
The fluid rate should be titrated to keep the
hourly urine output
>0.5cc/kg/hr in an adult thermal burn; 1.0 cc/kg/hr
in children.
6.
Uncertainty and inaccuracy of mathematical calculations
related to resuscitation formula have been eliminated by use
of the BurnWheel.[ix],[x]
C. Colloid
1.
Proteins in plasma generate oncotic pressure and serve
to maintain the intravascular volume. The administration of colloid compensates for this protein
lost.
2.
Much debate exists as to when capillary integrity
is established and when or if colloid should be given.[xi],[xii]
3.
Early infusion of colloid solutions may decrease
overall fluid requirements and reduce edema. However, excessive use of colloid risks iatrogenic pulmonary
complications.
4.
Guidelines for adding colloid to crystalloid regimen:
a. patients
with burns less than 30% TBSA do not usually require colloid
b. patients
with burns greater than 30% TBSA should receive colloid eight
hours after injury
c. patients
with inadequate urine output
d. colloid
is administered by adding 50g of albumin to each liter of
crystalloid
D. Hypertonic Saline
1.
Hypertonic salt solutions have been used for many years
in burn resuscitation.[xiii]
2.
The use of salt solutions of 240-300 mEq/L have
been shown to result in lower administered fluid
volumes than with isotonic crystalloid.16,[xiv]
This has thought to be advantageous in the elderly and
patients with premorbid cardiopulmonary disease.[xv]
3.
However, evidence has shown that when compared to
crystalloid solutions, hypertonic saline does not result in a
reduction in total fluid requirements or edema.[xvi],12
4.
Disadvantages include an osmotic diuresis which may
cause difficulty in the interpretation of urine outputs and
need frequent monitoring of serum sodium.
Deaths from renal failure have been reported, although
the trials
themselves use rather unusual regimens.
[xvii]
[i] Demling RH:
Fluid replacement in burned patients. Surg Clin
North Am 67(1):15-30, 1987.
[ii] Leape L.
Initial changes in burns:
tissue changes in burned and unburned skins of
Rhesus monkeys. J
Trauma. 1975; 15:969-75.
[iii] Baxter CR, Shires GT.
Physiological response to crystalloid resuscitation
of severe burns. Ann
NY Acad Sci. 1968; 150:874-94.
[iv] Schwartz SL.
Consensus summary on fluid resuscitation. J Trauma
1979; 19(11 Suppl): 876-7.
[v] Shires GT.
Proceedings of the second NIH workshop on burn
management. J
Trauma 1979; 19(11 Suppl): 862-3.
[vi] Brenner BM, Rector FC Jr.
eds. The
Kidney. Philadelphia: WB Saunders. 1981:95.
[vii] Carvajal HF.
Fluid therapy for the acutely burned child.
Comr Ther 1977; 3(3):17-24.
[viii] Carvajal HF.
A physiologic approach to fluid therapy in severely
burned children. Surg
Gynecol Obstet 1980;150:379-384.
[ix] Milner SM, Hodgetts TJ,
Rylah LTA. The
burns calculator: A
simple proposed guide for fluid resuscitation.
Lancet 1993;341:1089-1091.
[x] Milner SM, Rylah TA,
Bennett JDC. The
burn wheel: A
practical guide to resuscitation.
Burns 1995;21:288-390.
[xi] Demling RH, Kramer GD,
Harms B. Role
of thermal injury-induced hypoproteinemia on edema
formation in burned and non-burned tissue.
Surgery 1984; 95:136-44.
[xii] Goodwin CW, Dorothy J,
Lam V, Pruitt BA Jr.
Randomized trial of efficacy of crystalloid and
colloid resuscitation on hemodynamic response and lung
water following thermal injury. Ann Surg 1983; 197:520-31.
[xiii] Monafo WW, Halverson JD,
Schechtman K. The
role of concentrated sodium solutions in the resuscitation
of patients with severe burns.
Surgery. 1984;95: 129-35.
[xiv] Kinsky MP, Milner SN,
Button E, Dubick MA, Kramer GC.
Resuscitation of severe thermal injury with
hypertonic saline dextran: Effects on peripheral and
visceral edema in sheep. J Trauma 2000 (5)844-853.
[xv] Monafo WW, Halverson JD,
Schechtman K. The
role of concentrated sodium solutions in the resuscitation
of patients with severe burns.
Surgery. 1984;95: 129-35.
[xvi] Gunn SC, Kinsky MP,
Button B et. Al.: Burn
resuscitation: crystalloid
versus colloid versus hypertonic saline versus
hyperoncotic colloid in sheep.
Crit Care Med 24(11): 1849-1857, 1996.
[xvii] Huang PP, Stucku FS,
Dimick AR et al: Hypertonic
sodium resuscitation is associated with renal failure and
death. Ann
Surg 22(5): 543-557, 1995.
|