|
Chapter
7: Nutrition
_____NPO
_____high
protein and high calorie with milk
shakes
_____INFANT
FORMULA__________________________
_____tube
feedings
_____feeding tube
placement________________
_____enteral product
desired________________
MONITORING
_____calorie count
_____DAILY WEIGHTS
_____INDIRECT CALORIMETRY
_____24-HOUR URINE FOR URINE UREA
NITROGEN
_____prealbumin weekly
I.
PATHOPHYSIOLOGY
- There
is a postburn hypermetabolic response due to multiple
factors such as increased levels of circulating
catecholamines, glucagon, and cortisol.
The metabolic rates of patients with burns greater
then 40% TBSA are 100-150% greater than their basal
metabolic rate.
- Similar
to resuscitation formulae, the prescription for caloric
requirements is at best an estimate.
It is not possible to accurately calculate these
requirements, which vary with environmental temperatures
and humidity, inhalation injury, extent and depth of burn,
activity level, and surgery.
- Enteral
feedings given within the first 24 hours postburn have
been shown to decrease hyper-metabolism, decrease the
release of catabolic hormones, improve nitrogen balance,
maintain gut mucosal integrity, and decrease the incidence
of diarrhea.[i],[ii],[iii]
In addition, enteral feedings have been shown to increase
intestinal blood flow, preserve gastrointestinal function,
and minimize bacterial translocation from the gut.[iv],[v]
D. Adult Requirement
1.
The modified Harris Benedict formula is used to
calculate the daily Basal Energy of Expenditure (BEE) in
kilocalories:
BEE
(male) = [66 + (13.7 x wt.
in kg) + (5 x ht. in cm) - (6.8 x age)]
x [IF]
BEE
(female) = [655 + (9.6 x wt in kg) + (1.8 x ht. in cm) - (4.7
x age)] x [IF]
Where
IF= injury factor
Table I Injury
Factor[vi]
|
%TBSA
Burn
|
Injury
Factor (IF)
|
|
<20
|
1.4
|
|
20-25
|
1.6
|
|
25-30
|
1.7
|
|
30-35
|
1.8
|
|
35-40
|
1.9
|
|
40-45
|
2.0
|
|
>45
|
2.1
|
2.
Protein needs of the burn patient are increased,
due to the loss of nitrogen through burn wound exudates in
addition to urinary nitrogen losses.
Increased proteolysis raises amino acid substrate
demand.
Protein
Need= 20% of total kilocalories
E.
Pediatric Requirements
1.
Children have an increased surface area to weight
ratio, necessitating greater caloric requirements than adults.
2. Daily
Caloric Requirements
a.
BEE= [55 - (2 x age in yrs)] x wt in kg x GF x IF
Where
GF= growth factor; 1.5 over 1 yr of age; 2.0 under 1 yr of age
IF= injury factor; 2 for >10%
TBSA; 1.5 for <10%TBSA
- The
BEE should always be compared to the Recommended Daily
Allowance (RDA). These
values are often similar because the increased caloric
requirements due to the burn injury are balanced by the
decreased activity of the child.
Never give less than the RDA (see Table II).
Table
II Recommended Daily Allowances[vii]
|
Age
(yrs)
|
RDA
caloric requirement Kcal/kg
|
|
Birth
- 0.5
|
108
|
|
0.5-1.0
|
98
|
|
1-3
|
102
|
|
4-6
|
90
|
|
7-10
|
70
|
|
Males
11-14
|
55
|
|
Males
15-18
|
45
|
|
Females
11-14
|
47
|
|
Females
15-18
|
40
|
3.
Protein needs in children are 11-15% of total
kiloccalorie requirements.
There are 4 kcal of energy per gram of protein.
II.
Nothing by mouth (NPO)
Patients who are scheduled for immediate surgery
should have feedings held.
All other patients should begin nutritional
supplementation as soon as possible.
III. HIGH PROTEIN, HIGH CALORIE DIET WITH MILK SHAKES
Smaller
burns (<25% TBSA) with no associated facial injuries or
inhalational injury can receive a high protein/ high calorie
diet with milk shake supplements along with daily calorie
counts by the dietitian.
IV.
TUBE FEEDINGS
A.
Patients with larger surface area burns are usually
unable to meet their nutritional requirements by the oral
route only. Therefore,
these patients should receive continuous tube feedings.
B.
A nasogastric (NG) tube is first passed upon
admission. A softer Keofed feeding tube later replaces the NG tube.
C.
If the patient is not tolerating tube feedings, as
evidenced by nausea or emesis, the Keofed should be placed
into the duodenum.
D.
Patients with high gastric residuals should have
both a duodenal tube and a nasogastric tube for gastric
decompression.
E.
Feedings are started at full strength at 20 cc/hr
and increased slowly (by 10 cc/4 hrs) or rapidly (by 20
cc/4hrs) as tolerated until the goal hourly rate is achieved.
F.
Tube feedings are weaned as the patient increases
oral intake. When
the oral intake is 20-25% of caloric needs, tube feedings may
be administered during the nighttime only to stimulate
appetite and increase daytime oral intake.
When the patient can eat 80-90% of his caloric needs,
tube feedings may be discontinued.
G.
Complications of Tube feedings
1.
Gastric ileus is common in the patients with burns
to the trunk or abdomen.
If a patient with a feeding tube with its tip in the
stomach does not tolerate feedings, the tube may be passed
into the duodenum or jejunum.
This method reduces the risk of tube feeding
aspiration, and even allows feedings during surgery.[viii]
Placement of feeding tubes within the small intestine
can be accomplished via the use of weighted-tipped tubes, by
positioning the patient with the right side down, and with
promotility drugs such as metoclopramide (Reglan), by
endoscopy or fluoroscopy.
All of these techniques require radiographic
confirmation of placement in the small bowel.
Percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG) or
percutaneous endoscopic jejunostomy (PEJ) feeding tubes are
designed for extended periods.
2.
Aspiration - The incidence of documented aspiration
varies from 1 to 44%.[ix]
Food coloring added to the tube feedings can detect
aspiration by the change in color of respiratory secretions.
3.
Diarrhea - occurs in 10 to 20% of patients
receiving enteral tube feedings.
This is caused by both osmotic forces and by
malabsorption. Tube
feedings should not be stopped, as this will further aggravate
the diarrhea and will halt nutritional supplementation. For small intestinal feedings, the rate should be cut in half
and slowly increased as tolerated.
Discontinue any magnesium-containing antacids or other
medications that can promote diarrhea.
4.
Tube obstruction - Feeding tubes become obstructed
in about 10% of patients,[x]
usually from feedings that has formed an occlusive plug.
Usually the tube can be prevented by flushing with warm
water before and after each infusion.[xi]
Unplugging a clotted tube can be achieved by flushing
with Coke, Mountain Dew, meat tenderizer, or Viokase.16
V.
ENTERAL PRODUCTS
Table
III
Product
|
Calories/ml
|
Protein
Gm/L
(% of total kcals)
|
|
OsmoliteÒ
|
1.06
|
37.1 (14%)
|
|
Osmolite HNÒ
|
1.06
|
44.3 (16.7%)
|
|
JevityÒ
|
1.06
|
44.3 (16.7%)
|
|
GlucernaÒ
|
1.0
|
41.8 (16.7%)
|
|
NeproÒ
|
2.0
|
70 (14%)
|
|
PediasureÒ
|
1.0
|
30(12%)
|
A.
The Osmolite products are the most commonly used
formulae in our adult patients.
They are identical to Jevity, but without the fiber.
The Osmolite HNâ
(High Nitrogen) product is used in patients with normal renal
function.
B.
Jevityâ
is used for patients with diarrhea and loose stools due to its
increased fiber content.
C.
Additives such as pectin flakes and free water to
decrease feed strength are not recommended due to risk of
contamination.
D.
Glucernaâ
has low carbohydrate and higher fat content, and is
recommended for patients with poorly controlled blood sugars.
E.
The moderate proetin concentration of Neproâ
makes it useful in patients with poor renal function.
F.
Pediasureâ
is the standard feeding formula for pediatric patients.
G.
Total parenteral nutrition (TPN) is seldom used and
is reserved for patients with very prolonged digestive tract
dysfunction. Immunosuppression
and increased mortality was shown in patients with burns
greater than 50% TBSA randomized to receive intravenous
feeding versus enteral calories alone.[xii]
VI.
MONITORING
A.
Calorie counts are the most important determination
of adequate nutrition.
B.
Body weight is also useful, since changes in weight
from admission allow an assessment of fluid balance[xiii]
and nutrition.[xiv]
Body weight within 10% of the admission weight
indicates adequate nutrition.[xv]
C.
Indirect calorimetry is measured weekly.
a.
Metabolism can be assessed by measurement of :
oxygen consumption (uO2),
carbon dioxide production (uCO2),
and energy expenditure with the production of water and heat.
Because heat and water production is not easy to
measure, uO2
and uCO2
are used as indirect measures of the metabolic energy
expenditure, forming the basis for “indirect calorimetry.”
The uO2
and uCO2
are determined by measuring the concentration of O2
and CO2 in inhaled and exhaled gas. The daily resting energy expenditure (REE) is calculated by
the formula:
REE
(kcal/day)= 3.94 (uO2)
+ 1.1(uCO2)
X 1440
The REE is increased by 20% to account for daily
activity. The REE
is similar to the basal daily energy requirements but includes
the thermal effect of food.
b.
Indirect calorimetry also allows for the
calculation of the Respiratory Quotient (RQ) which is the
ratio of uCO2
to uO2
(RQ=uCO2/uO2).
Glucose has the highest RQ (1.0) and fat has the lowest
(0.7). The RQ
from indirect calorimetry will measure the average
contribution from carbohydrate and fat and will provide an
index of the major fuel source in the patient.
An overall RQ above 0.9 indicates excess carbohydrate
calories in the diet.[xvi]
The amount of carbohydrates given to the patient with
an RQ at this level should be reduced to bring the RQ below
0.9, especially in patients with respiratory failure, to limit
the tendency for CO2 retention.
D.
The 24-hour urine urea nitrogen is performed once
per week with the indirect calorimetry measurements.
The purpose is to determine whether the patient is in
positive or negative nitrogen balance.
Negative nitrogen balance implies a catabolic state.
E.
Prealbumin has a normal range of 17-40 mg/dl and a
half-life of 1.9 days, compared to the traditional nutritional
marker, albumin, which has a half-life of 21 days. Therefore,
by monitoring with prealbumin, a response to therapy will be
seen much sooner. Serum albumin may be within the normal range
while prealbumin indicates declining nutritional status.
Prealbumin is also less affected by changes in hydration
status and liver and renal function than other testing
methods.
VI.
EXAMPLES
A.
Adult patient - a 30 year-old man who weighs 70kg, is 6 feet tall, and has
a 50% TBSA burn
1.
Calculate caloric needs using the Harris Benedict
formula:
66+
(13.7 x 70) + (5 x 183) – (6.8 x 30) = BEE of 1736 Cals (1
Cal=1 kcal)
2.
Multiply Cals by the Injury Factor (IF).
For a 50% burn the IF is 2.
Therefore the 24-hour caloric need is 3472 Cals.
3.
Determine the amount of protein needed.
Protein should account for 20% of the total calories,
or 694 Cals. Since
there are 4 Cals per gram of protein, the patient needs 174
grams of protein/day.
4.
Feeding rates are based on a 21 hour day, since
tube feedings are
temporarily stopped to allow
dressing changes, physical therapy, etc.
For this patient, Osmolite HN will be used (1.06
Cal/ml). Thus,
his goal-feeding rate is 155 cc/hr.
B.
Pediatric patient – a 2 year-old child who
weighs 13kg with a 30% TBSA burn
1.
Calculate caloric needs using the pediatric
formula:
[55- (2 x 2)] x 13 = 663 Cals
2.
Multiply Cals by the Growth Factor (GF), which in
this patient is 1.5, and by the Injury Factor (IF), which in
this patient is 2. Thus
the patient’s 24-hour caloric need is 1989 Cals.
3.
Compare this with the RDA caloric needs, which for
this child is 102 kcal/kg or 1326 Cals.
Feedings should at minimum provide this amount of
calories.
4.
Determine the amount of protein needed.
Since protein in a child should account for 11 to 15%
of the total calories, this patient should receive at most 219
to 298 Cals from protein, or 55 to 75 grams of protein.
5.
The patient will receive Pediasure (1 Cal/cc) over
a 21 hour feeding day. Since
it is safer from a fluid standpoint, use the RDA to calculate
caloric needs (i.e. 1326 Cals) to arrive at a starting feeding
rate of 63 cc/hr.
[i] Chiarelli A, Enzi G,
Casadei A, Baggio B, Valerio A, Mazzoleni F, Very early nutrition supplementation in burned patients.
Am J Clin Nutr. 1990; 51:1035-9.
[ii] Saito H, Trocki O,
Alexander JW, Kopcha R, Heyd T, Joffe SN. The effect of route of nutrient administration on the
nutritional state, catabolic hormone secretion, and gut
mucosal integrity after burn injury.
J Parenter Enter Nutr 1987;11:1-7.
[iii] Mochizuki H, Trocki O,
Dominioni L, Brackett KA, Joffe SN, Alexander JW.
Mechanism of prevention of postburn hypermetabolism
and catabolism by early enteral feeding.
Ann Surg. 1984; 200:297-308.
[iv] Alexander JW.
Immunological responses in the burned patient.
J Trauma 1979; 19:887-9.
[v] Alexander JW, Gottschlich
MM. Nutritional
immunomodulation in burn patients.
Crit Care Med 1990;18:S149-53.
[vi] Williamson J.
Actual burn nutrition care practices: A National
Survey (Part II). J Burn Care Rehabil. 1989: 10(Pt 2):185-94.
[vii] Food and Nutrition Board.
Recommended dietary allowances. 10th ed.
Washington, DC: National Academy of Sciences, 1989.
[viii] Jenkins M, Gottschlich
MM, Mayes T, Khoury J, Warden G. Enteral feeding during operative procedures.
J Burn Care Rehabil, 1994; 15:199-205.
[ix] Koruda M, Geunther P,
Rombeau J. Enteral
nutrition in the critically ill.
Crit Care Clin 1987; 3:
133-153.
[x] Marcuard CP
Segall KL, Trogdon S.
Clearing obstructed feeding tubes. JPEN 1989;
13:81-83.
[xi] Rombeau JL, Caldwell MD,
Forlaw L, Geunter PA eds.
Atlas of nutritional support techniques. Boston: Little,
Brown & Co., 1989; 77-106.
[xii] Herndon DN, Barrow RE,
Stein M, Linares H, Rutan R, Abston S. Increased mortality with intravenous supplemental feeding in
severely burned patients.
J Burn Care Rehabil 1989; 10:309-13.
[xiii] Gump FE, Kinney JM:
Energy balance and weight loss in burned patients,
Arch Surg 103:442-448, 1971.
[xiv] Morath MA, Miller SF,
Finley RK, Jones LM:
Interpretation of nutritional parameters in burn
patients, J Burn Care Rehabil 4:361-366, 1983.
[xv] Gottschlich MM:
Assessment and nutritional management of the burn
patient. In
Winkler MF, Lysen C (eds):
Suggested guidelines for nutrition and metabolic
management of adult patients receiving nutrition support,
Chicago, 1993, American
Dietetic Association.
[xvi] Stein TP.
Why measure the repiratory quotient of patients on
total parenteral nutrition?
J Am Coll Nutr 1985; 4:501-513.
|