|
Chapter 9: Cultures
_________swab
all partial thickness or undetermined depth of burn on
admission or when there is a change in wound drainage (color
and consistency)
_________punch
biopsy for quantitative bacteriology on all full thickness
burns when there is a change in wound appearance
I.
The Burn
Wound
A.
Serves as the site of primary invasion for local
and systemic infection.[i],[ii]
Burn wounds become infected within 3 to 5 days
after admission. Generally
the infection arises from bacteria in the hair follicles and
sebaceous glands. Some
exogenous organisms may become pathogenic (i.e. exposure to
pond or runoff water after a burn or transmission of organisms
from attendant personnel). Perivascular bacterial growth is followed by vessel
thrombosis and dermal necrosis, which will convert a
partial-thickness burn to a full-thickness burn.
The likelihood of infection and invasion increases with
burn depth.
B.
Once bacterial organisms encounter viable tissue,
they will either locally invade the wound to produce a septic
burn wound or spread via blood or lymph to produce burn
wound sepsis. Burned
and unburned skin should be inspected daily for black, brown,
or grey spots; and for hemorrhagic, vesicular or necrotic
areas.
C. Signs of a septic
burn wound[iii]:
1.
black, brown, or purple discoloration
2.
edema at skin margins
3.
sloughed burn tissue or eschar
4.
subcutaneous hemorrhagic discoloration
5.
conversion of partial-thickness wound to
full-thickness
wound
6.
abscess formation
D. Signs
of burn wound sepsis:
1.
Gram-negative sepsis
a.
burn wound biopsy >105
organisms/g tissue and/or histologic evidence of tissue
invasion of subadjacent unburned tissue
b. rapid illness in 8-12 hrs
c. temperature >38°C
d. increased WBC
e. hypothermia (<35°C)
and decreased WBC
f. decreased blood pressure and urine output
g. focal wound gangrene
h. satellite lesions away from burn wound
i. mental status changes
2.
Gram-positive sepsis
a.
burn wound biopsy >105
organisms/g tissue and/or histologic evidence of tissue
invasion (except b-hemolytic
strep. where only a few organisms cause wound infection,
failure of primary closure, and loss of skin grafts[iv])
b. gradual onset of symptoms
c. temperature of 40°C
or higher
d. increased WBC
e. decreased hematocrit
f. decreased blood pressure and urine output
E. Patients with
signs and symptoms of burn wound sepsis should have immediate
institution of antibiotics in conjunction with Infectious
Disease service recommendations.
II.
Swab all partial thickness or undetermined depth
of burn on admission or when there is a change in wound
drainage (color and consistency)
Swab cultures will identify the type of microorganism
present. Wounds
and/or dressings over burn wounds, skin grafts, and donor
sites should be inspected and swab cultures taken for any
changes in the color, odor, and amount of exudates from the
wound. Fungal
infection is marked by rapidly emerging new spreading dark
discolorations.
III. Punch biopsy
on all full thickness burns when there is a change in wound
appearance
A.
Quantitative culture is obtained by a full
thickness punch biopsy, which are obtained from every 18% TBSA
burned. Studies
have shown that when colony counts on quantitative culture are
less than 102 organisms/gram, graft survival is
greater than 90%, but when counts were greater than 105,
only 60% of grafts survive.[v]
Quantitative cultures showing high bacterial counts
correlate with histological evidence of burn wound infection
in approximately 80% of cases.[vi],[vii],[viii]
The one important exception to these studies is
with the Streptococcus species,
in which the mere presence of a few b-hemolytic
streptococci can cause wound infection or graft loss.4
The full-thickness biopsy should be repeated twice
weekly on each
18% TBSA burned area until the full-thickness burn has
been
excised. Repeat
cultures will provide information as to the emergence of new
bacterial infections as well as monitor the effectiveness of
topical antimicrobial therapy.
B.
If wound cultures reveal greater than103
organisms/g, topical therapy should be changed.
If silver sulfadiazene is used on a burn wound, it
should be replaced with mafenide acetate, which has better
eschar penetration. If
a donor site or skin graft is infected, mafenide acetate soaks
should be used after daily dressing changes.
IV.
Catheter Infections
A.
In a study of hospitalized hematology-oncology
patients, culture of blood drawn through either the central
catheter or peripheral vein shows excellent negative
predictive value. Culture of blood drawn through an indwelling
central venous catheter has low positive predictive value,
apparently less than from a peripheral venipuncture.
Therefore, a positive result from a catheter needs clinical
interpretation and may require confirmation.[ix]
B.
Diagnosis
1.
Catheter infection is considered when:
a.
There is no other obvious source for sepsis and the
catheter has been in place longer than for 3 days for an
internal jugular or femoral venous site, or longer than 7 days
for a subclavian site,
b.
There is erythema around the catheter insertion
site
c.
Pus can be expressed
from the catheter insertion site.
d. The
catheter should be removed and sent for both gram stain and
for routine culture and antibiotic sensitivities.
2.
The gram stain provides immediate information
concerning organism morphology as a guide to antibiotic
coverage.
3.
The interpretation of catheter tip cultures by the
“semiquantitative” culture technique (where the catheter
is rolled over the surface of a sheep blood agar plate and the
number of colonies are counted[x])
in conjunction with blood cultures is listed in Table
I.
Table 1
Table I:
Interpretation of Semiquantitative Catheter Cultures[xi]
|
Blood
Culture
|
Colony
Count
(colonies/catheter)
|
Interpretation
|
|
Positive
|
>15
|
Catheter
is source of septicemia
|
|
Positive
|
<15
|
Catheter colonized
|
|
Negative
|
>15
|
Catheter infected locally
(but cannot rule out intermittent
septicemia)
|
|
Negative
|
<15
|
Catheter is colonized
|
4.
As Table I indicates, negative blood cultures
should not be disregarded when the catheter tip shows large
numbers of organisms present.
The infected catheter in this situation may still seed
the bloodstream, but the septicemia is easily missed because
it may be intermittent. Less
than 50% of catheter tips with dense growth are associated
with positive blood cultures.13
5.
Once catheter sepsis has been diagnosed, the
catheter should be removed and antibiotics started to prevent
life-threatening endocarditis.[xii] A study comparing burn
patients with major burn injuries randomly assigned to undergo
site change every 48 hours versus guidewire exchange every 48
hours at the same site showed no advantage to changing the
insertion site. Guidewire change did not prevent nor predict
catheter bacterial contamination.[xiii]
6.
The femoral vein site has been successfully used in
burn patients. A prospective study was undertaken to determine
the safety of femoral vein catheterization in patients with
burns. None
of the differences in catheter colonization and
catheter-related sepsis between femoral and non-femoral vein
catheter sites were statistically significant, and there were
no noninfectious complications from femoral vein
catheterization.[xiv]
Femoral venous catheters are also considered safe in
burned children and are associated with a low incidence of
infectious and mechanical complications.[xv]
[i]Teplitz C.
The pathology of burn and fundamentals of burn
wound sepsis. In:
Artz CP, Moncrief JA, Pruitt BA Jr. Eds.
Burns: A
Team Approach. Philadelphia: WB
Saunders Co., 1979:45-94.
[ii] Teplitz C, Davis D, Mason
AD, Moncrief JA. Pseudomonas
burn wound sepsis. I.
Pathogenesis of experimental pseudomonas burn wound
sepsis. J
Surg Res 1964; 4: 200-16.
[iii] Herndon DN (editor).
Total Burn Care.
London: WB
Saunders, 1996. P.113.
[iv] Robson MC and Heggers JP.
Surgical infection.
II. b-hemolytic
streptococcus. J
Surg Res 1969; 9:289.
[v] Robson MC, Krizek TS.
Predicting skin graft survival.
J Trauma. 1973; 13(3): 213-17.
[vi] Heggers JP, Robson MC eds.
Quantitative Bacteriology:
Its Role in the Armamentarium of the Surgeon.
1st ed.
Boca Raton, FL:
CRC Press, Inc. 1991: 139.
[vii] Teplitz C, Davis D, Mason
AD, Moncrief JA. Pseudomonas
burn wound sepsis. I.
Pathogenesis of experimental pseudomonas burn wound
sepsis. J
Surg Res 1964; 4:200-16.
[viii] Robson MC, Krizek TJ,
Heggers JP. Biology
of surgical infection.
In: Ravitch
MM, ed. Current Problems in Surgery.
Chicago: Yearbook
Medical Publishers, 1973: 1-62.
[ix]
DesJardin JA. Falagas
ME. Ruthazer
R. Griffith J. Wawrose
D. Schenkein
D. Miller K. Snydman
DR. Clinical utility of blood cultures drawn from
indwelling central venous catheters in hospitalized
patients with cancer. Annals of Internal Medicine.
131(9):641-7, 1999 Nov 2.
[x] Maki DG, Weise CE, Sarafin
HW. A
semiquantitative culture method for identifying
intravenous-catheter related infection.
N Engl J Med 296:1305-1309,
1977.
[xi] Maki et al.
A semiquantitative method for identifying
intravenous catheter related infection. N Engl J Med 1977; 296:1305-1309.
[xii] Power J.
Wing EJ, Talamo TS, et.al
Fatal bacterial endocarditis as a complication of
permanent indwelling catheters. Am J Med 1986; 81:166-168.
[xiii] Kealey:
J Trauma, Volume 38(3).March 1995.344-349.
[xiv]
Murr MM. Rosenquist MD. Lewis RW 2d. Heinle JA. Kealey GP.
A prospective safety study of femoral vein versus
nonfemoral vein catheterization in patients with burns.
Journal of Burn Care & Rehabilitation. 12(6):576-8,
1991 Nov-Dec.
[xv] Goldstein:
J Pediatr, Volume 130(3).March 1997.442-446.
|